Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Lost CausesAgenda Vetting in Global Issue Networks and the Shaping of Human Security$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Charli Carpenter

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780801448850

Published to Cornell Scholarship Online: August 2016

DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9780801448850.001.0001

Show Summary Details

Conclusion

Conclusion

Chapter:
(p.148) Conclusion
Source:
Lost Causes
Author(s):

Charli Carpenter

Publisher:
Cornell University Press
DOI:10.7591/cornell/9780801448850.003.0007

This concluding chapter argues that the three cases showcased in previous chapters demonstrate that gatekeeper adoption matters, usually occurs after a period of agenda vetting and often doesn't happen at all. Additionally, while agenda vetting is a function of a cluster of factors, intranetwork relations play an important role in gatekeepers' judgments about when to adopt new issues or to exercise agenda denial. Not only do hierarchies among transnational actors confer power on central organizations to “vet” the advocacy agenda, but network effects also help constitute those organizations' preferences. To conclude, the chapter outlines the implications of this book's study for issue entrepreneurs, for global policy elites, and for students of international relations.

Keywords:   advocacy gatekeepers, intranetwork relations, agenda adoption, agenda denial, advocacy agenda, network effects, global policy, international relations

Cornell Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.