Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Hazard or HardshipCrafting Global Norms on the Right to Refuse Unsafe Work$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jeffrey Hilgert

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780801451898

Published to Cornell Scholarship Online: August 2016

DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9780801451898.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM Cornell University Press SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.cornell.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of Cornell University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in Cornell for personal use (for details see www.cornell.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy/privacy-policy-and-legal-notice).date: 23 October 2018

Commodified Workers and the International Response

Commodified Workers and the International Response

Chapter:
(p.1) Introduction Commodified Workers and the International Response
Source:
Hazard or Hardship
Author(s):

Jeffrey Hilgert

Publisher:
Cornell University Press
DOI:10.7591/cornell/9780801451898.003.0008

This introductory chapter provides an overview of the book's main themes. This book is about the history of the right to refuse unsafe work under international labor standards. It details how workers lost the right to refuse under international labor and human rights norms. It takes an in-depth look at how our global society has decided to resolve—and failed to resolve—the protection of any fundamental human right to refuse unsafe work. Around the world, every society and government must decide how to protect, or not to protect, each worker from retaliation and termination. This involves not just drafting a progressive antidiscrimination law; it also involves the regulating of work and employment relations on a more fundamental level. Ultimately, the right to refuse unsafe work is a moral question for society. If society crafts institutions, laws, and regulations that expose workers to hostile supervisors and managers without effective recourse, a moral choice has been made. Such a moral choice finds it acceptable that workers are forced to choose between their physical health and safety or their economic livelihood and basic subsistence.

Keywords:   hazardous work, right to refuse, unsafe work, occupational health and safety, international labor standards, human rights

Cornell Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.