Interests, Places, Community, and the State
This chapter investigates the rising incidence of social conflicts in new neighborhoods and the articulation of collective interests around property rights issues in middle-class residential communities. An analysis of their framing mechanisms shows that these do not carry the potential for societal autonomy that other authors have suggested. This potential is effectively contained by the physical form that these residential compounds have taken (gated and walled compounds, often managed by private companies). The walls provide a concrete marker of how broadly certain interests are allowed to coalesce without triggering a reaction by the authoritarian state. This contained contention also reduces the potential for systemic unrest and the risks for the overall stability of the regime.
Cornell Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.